Harford County Investigates Animal Hoarding In Wake Of Fire
Dozens of dead animals were found inside a home in the 2400 block of Rocks Road in Forest Hill following a fire at the home.
Dozens of animals were found dead inside a Forest Hill home following a Monday night fire, and county officials are investigating the home as a possible case of animal hoarding.
Around 11:16 p.m. a fire broke out in the kitchen of a one-story home in the 2400 block of Rocks Road in Forest Hill, according to a release from the Maryland State Fire Marshal's Office.
Firefighters arrived to combat the blaze, and quickly controlled it. After suppressing the fire, firefighters found a number of dead cats and other animals inside the house, according to a release from Harford County Government.
Firefighters called in county animal control and department of licencing and permits to assist at the scene.
Animal Control officers along with the Maryland Department of Natural Resources returned to the home Tuesday and recovered 30 dead animals, including reptiles from the one-story home, according to the release. Among the dead animals was a fox that was found inside a refrigerator.
At least a dozen cats that died due to the fire had been buried on the property before officials arrived Tuesday, according to the county release.
Officials removed six cats, two dogs, nine raccoons and three turtles which were found alive on the Rocks Road property. The live animals were taken to the Humane Society of Harford County for check-ups and a safe place to stay. The raccoons will be euthanized, according to the release.
In Harford County, if owners have more than five domestic animals they need a special permit.
No charges have been filed against the homeowners and the investigation is ongoing.
This is not the first case of its kind to be investigated in Harford County or the state as a whole.
A Howard County woman was on trial last week on 60 charges of animal cruelty in connection with 40 dead animals found inside her home.
JDK
9:17 am on Wednesday, August 29, 2012
Why are the raccoon's being euthanized?
DeDe
11:17 am on Wednesday, August 29, 2012
I was wondering the same thing about the raccoons. If it is believed that they couldn't survive in the wild, can't they be sent to a wildlife refuge somewhere??
Pauline
11:25 am on Wednesday, August 29, 2012
I know these people! They are wonderful people and love animals, they rescue animals when noone else takes care of them! They work just to provide for their animals like their own children. They failed to mention in any reports that all animals were found in good health and well taken care of! And the raccoons were probably trying to eat their chickens, etc so they trapped them! And seriously whats the big deal about the fox in a fridge, when we hunt we store them to later skin and use. I love how people try to make these people look bad.
Bob
1:24 pm on Wednesday, August 29, 2012
Pauline, typically when you have that many animals in a contained environment, the cleanliness goes downhill. Did you know anything about the living conditions inside the house?
Denise Martin
2:04 pm on Wednesday, August 29, 2012
Having 30 dead animals inside their home is NOT being well taken care of! The live animals being exposed to this is a serious health hazard. Any animal from this house found in good health is going to be a miracle! If this is how they would take care of their own human children, they'd be arrested.
DeDe
2:39 pm on Wednesday, August 29, 2012
I didn't see anything in the Patch report that indicated those animals were dead BEFORE the fire.....
Ellen
9:39 pm on Thursday, August 30, 2012
These people did rescue work and fostered animals . They are very good people and take very good care of the animals in thier care. Just because there were 30 animals on this property does not mean they wer enot take care of. I would trust my animals with this family anytime. I know them personally and offer my support and assistance
Bobbi Johnson
4:08 pm on Wednesday, August 29, 2012
OH lets kill these innocent animals at the HUMANE society, Humane society makes me sick to be honest maybe someone should turn them in for killing animals and freezing them, I have seen it with my own eyes, and they want to make it do hard for animals to get adopted thats why noone will adopt them some of the time.
Penelope Patch
11:56 pm on Wednesday, August 29, 2012
It does seem like the adoption fee is a bit high. In order to get more people to adopt, they periodically drop the cost charged. Why not just permanently lower it and then maybe more people would want to adopt? Just a thought.
Karl Schuub
4:23 pm on Wednesday, August 29, 2012
It's a bit odd to say the least to have dozens of dead animals frozen in your home; not to mention hurriedly burying dozens for more cats in your yard...I assume they died from smoke inhalation??? I smell a "no-kill" involvement here and just wait for the apologists and claims that all the animals end up dead at the shelter. 10, 9, 8...
Christine
5:49 pm on Wednesday, August 29, 2012
Karl, the humane society does not publish their numbers. If you know how many animals make it of there alive vs. ending up in the freezer, please share.
Karl Schuub
8:16 am on Thursday, August 30, 2012
10, 9, 8, 7...I should have expected you'd show up. Go ahead explain to us how dozens of dead frozen animals is justified and normal because it's just so much worse at the shelter. Let's hear some more insanity out of mouths of the no kill apologists. Further, explain to us how humane it is to keep dozens of animals shoved together in a house that I'm sure was filthy...no way you can keep 40 animals in a house and have that be any different. Explain to us how being licensed as a rescue isn't possible because that would require inspections and there just isn't time when we need places to put these animals because after all the shelter is so much worse. I kinda know in advance whatever you say will make no sense because just as simple as that...it makes no sense to hoard dozens of animals inside your house. Nobody quickly buries a bunch of animals unless they're trying to hide the fact that they were breaking the law in the first place. You have to be licensed to run any sort of shelter and clearly they weren't. Love to see what they're involvement in the goofy "no-kill" hysterical group because I'm betting you know these people personally.
Christine
8:21 pm on Tuesday, September 4, 2012
I do not know these people and neither do you, Karl. You act like you are a representative of the humane society, the fire department, animal control.... Are you? You know if it was so important to inspect these dead animals, you could have dug them up again. What were these people supposed to do other than bury their dead? I am a former resident of Harford County and I live in Austin, TX, a community that has embraced 'no kill' and it is working for us. In my opinion the "kill" people are the apologists.
rose bauman
8:29 am on Friday, September 14, 2012
You are so right! No kill people believe that it's good enough just to be "breathing", never mind the quality of life for these animals, because they don't want them "killed"! It's disgusting what misery these no kill people create for animals. And the foolish comments from people who defend these tragedies! And actually believe that adoption is the solution.
Dot thompson
10:18 pm on Wednesday, August 29, 2012
all the opinions aside, my family lost home in Feb.to a fire &w lost quite a few animals. they were buried the next day-what else would you expect them to do? it's bad enough to loose everything you own, but to lose what you love almost hurts more.my heart& prayers go out to them. unless you really have something nice to say, don't say anything at all.
Jean Wilson
5:36 am on Thursday, August 30, 2012
Raccoons now carry a very serious disease that is hazardous to domestic animals (cats & dogs) as well as to humans. That is why is now illegal to keep raccoons as pets and also why most wildlife rescues won't even take them, and if they do, they keep them completely isolated, use raccoon-only crates, etc. Depending on whether these were trapped raccoons or raised from babies, they probably would not make good pets (very few wild animals make good pets, even though I did have an orphaned raccoon as a kid and she was awesome, however, we did rehab her and she lived a long life in the wild, returning for "visits" on a regular basis for years - a very unusual scenario and also long before this current health issue they all now have). It took probably half a year to rehab the one we had and teach her what she needed to know to survive in the wild and not many people would invest the time in a wild animal that may still not learn what it needs to survive and also one that could infect you with a disease as well ! Even though I don't personally think it was the right thing to do or for the right reasons if that is the case, that is probably why they felt they had to euthanize them.
Concerned in BelAir
11:58 am on Thursday, August 30, 2012
I also know this family and they are a compassionate animal loving couple. They truly love and care for these animals and were trying to find them homes. The animals were all in good health and were well taken care of. The only thing she did wrong was not aquire the right permits to have more than 5 animals in the house. She nursed so many of the animals who were sick back to health. I have seen her jump in and help others with their pets as well. They are not crazy animal horders they are just people who love and care about these animals and find them homes. I wish their were more people like them. I am so sorry to hear of the fire as if the fire wasnt enough they lost animals they cared and loved. And what were they suppose to do sit there and look and the dead animals.. they buried them because they care not to hide anything. I will keep them in my thoughts and prayers.
Karl Schuub
1:10 pm on Thursday, August 30, 2012
They buried them before animal control could get there to hide the fact that they had 48 cats at the house...2 dogs and 9 racoons and fox that they had apparently freeze-dried. That's 59 animals in a fairly small house, some dead and some in the freezer - call it whatever you want but people that think rationally understand that's a hoarder. Insane as it is to keep a bunch of cats and dogs in those numbers - the idea that they had kept racoons puts the neighbors at risk too. As well intentioned as you think they are - we now have a bunch of dead animals that wouldn't be dead except that they were all kept in this house - how is that better than the shelter where they could have been adopted if deemed properly socialized except of course the racoons.
Diana V
12:20 pm on Thursday, August 30, 2012
Why cant the raccoons be donated to a zoo, I bet the Plumpton Zoo would take them.
Jsunnygirl
11:09 pm on Saturday, September 1, 2012
Ok just a few things to educate people on this forum. If you have that many animals in a small location like that no matter how hard you try you cannot control disease and properly care for all of them. To properly maintain an animal is expensive and should be considered a luxury. Their heart may have been in the right place but what they did is indeed hoarding. I'm not taking up for the shelter but they unfortunately have to take all unwanted animals in this county (good and bad) and are forced to do everyone's dirty work because people refuse to spay and neuter their pets. Most of the shelters or any rescue's adoption fees often cover the money they have put in the animals and often they lose money on the adoptions. If you can't afford the adoption fee you can't afford the pet!! As for the raccoons, hasn't anyone heard of the fatal disease,RABIES??? They can't be kept in captivity because there is no way of knowing if they are rabid or not unless they show symptoms or you send their head off for testing. They exposed themselves and all those animals that lived in the home. If the animals aren't current on rabies shots they will either have to be euthanized or held in quarantine for 6 months.
Karl Schuub
4:51 pm on Sunday, September 2, 2012
Completely agree..it should however be of note that this original report of 40 or so animals is now up to nearly 150. It's currently being reported by the firefighters who originally entered the house that the entire place smelled of urine and feces to a degree that they had to fumigate and thoroughly decontaminate all equipment that was in the home. Yes, they are hoarders who apparently will be charged with a list of crimes within the next week. Hoarding animals is not having your heart in the right place; it's a selfish and ill-conceived behavior of someone who is mentally ill.
Christine
7:24 pm on Tuesday, September 4, 2012
'To properly maintain an animal is expensive and should be considered a luxury.' Really? Only rich people should have pets?
Laurie
12:22 am on Friday, September 21, 2012
The raccons could have been sent to a rehab licened to rehab racoons. And yes hoarders seem liek nice people and usually have good intentions but they and their animals suffer A LOT!