patching...
Breaking: Longshot Oxbow Wins Preakness Stakes »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

How Harford County Lawmakers Voted on Death Penalty Repeal

Spoiler alert: Even the sole Democratic representative voted against it. How do you feel about death penalty repeal in the state of Maryland?

 

All that's left to bring an end to the death penalty in Maryland is the stroke of Gov. Martin O'Malley's pen—much to the chagrin of Harford County lawmakers who unanimously voted against the repeal. HI

Legislators in the House of Delegates—in a 82-56 vote—successfully passed the repeal of the death penalty, making Maryland the 18th state to do so.

Seven of eight Harford County Delegates, however, cast votes against the repeal Friday. That list also includes party-line breaker, Democrat Mary-Dulaney James, who represents Havre de Grace and Aberdeen. Del. Pat McDonough was absent. (See chart)

Delegate District Vote
Glen Glass 34A No
Mary-Dulany James 34A No
H. Wayne Norman, Jr. 35A No
Donna M. Stifler 35A No
Susan K. McComas 35B No
Richard K. Impallaria 7 No
Patrick L. McDonough 7 Absent
Kathy Szeliga 7 No

>>> Imagine you're a Maryland lawmaker. How would you have voted on repealing the death penalty and why? Answer in the comments section below.

Related Topics: Death Penalty, Harford County Government, and Mar. 2013 Week 2 In Review

R.U.Kidding

6:31 pm on Friday, March 15, 2013

O'Malley cited one reason for repeal of the death penalty is the expense. Please someone tell me how much more expensive is it to house an inmate for life? Heinous crimes involving a first degree murder conviction should carry a death penalty. I think this is a big mistake.

Reply

AG

7:25 pm on Friday, March 15, 2013

Yet another reason to move to Texas

Reply

carl gustafson

6:55 am on Saturday, March 16, 2013

Just one more reason Maryland goes down the tubes.
WHEN will the people of Maryland WAKE UP and clean house in Annapolis???
Born and raised in Kent County, however, it is painfully obvious the majority of the voting public in Maryland is stupid.

Reply

WeThe People

8:53 am on Saturday, March 16, 2013

Tkae Responsibility! says.."Kill them all." Who, the criminals or the politicians, or both?
Again, the criminal has more LIBERAL sympathy than victims and their rights. An eye for an eye.Expense??? It's a ton cheaper than housing them, feeding them, watching them, building libraries for them, providing tv, and ammenities for their comfort!!!! while their victims lie in dark cold boxes without voice or care or company....PUT THOSE THAT DID IT THERE TOO!!!!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Joe Q Public

8:32 pm on Saturday, March 16, 2013

Criminals , Politicians one in the same! Support or oppose WHY IN THE HELL is this issue priority when the state/country is in the worse shape in history? These assholes in Annapolis better remember history repeats itself! As in ARMED REVOLT AGAINST A TYRANNICAL GOVERNMENT! The current establishment is more concerned about the rights of deadbeats,criminals and illegal's than they are about the state of the people paying for it all! GET IT RIGHT OR GET THE HELL OUT!

Comment_arrow

1ke

9:00 pm on Saturday, March 16, 2013

Joe Q., you have got to be joking.

You'd better be glad that your First Amendment rights are protected. You better be glad that the death penalty is one its way out. Your rant sounds seditious, if not treasonous to me.

Tom D

9:43 am on Saturday, March 16, 2013

Agree with all of the above. How can housing them for life be cheaper then ending their life NOW.

The real problem is the appeal process. 2-4 years and then the end

Reply

ben dover

9:52 am on Saturday, March 16, 2013

Totally for the death penalty. Agree with the comments above. And I don't agree with allowing these criminals 10 appeals in states that have the death penalty. Just treat them the way they treated their victims which landed them in jail In the first place.

Reply

FLRush

10:03 am on Saturday, March 16, 2013

Very proud that our Harford County Delegation demonstatrated common sense in voting No. I too would also like to know how it costs more to house a prisoner for life versus execution. Now that this very important deterrent to crime has been removed our Police Officers, Prison Guards and the Public in general are at a lot greater risk of injury and death from some low life criminal. Hopefully this will go to referendum and there are enough people with common sense in Maryland to overturn this. Look up who voted for this and clean house next election. Mr. Owe Malley, go tell the family of someone brutally murdered how you will house the criminal for life and provided free medical and meals and other amenities.

Reply

John Bowman

1:40 pm on Saturday, March 16, 2013

FL Rush,
It is up to us, the voters, to make sure this repeal goes to referendum. Well done Harford County Representatives!!!

Reply

franking

2:16 pm on Saturday, March 16, 2013

Too expensive to carry out capital punishment? Put in an express lane like Texas did.

I have compassion for criminals, too. That's why I think the worst of them are so evil that even other criminals shouldn't be forced to live among them. When an incarcerated person gets killed in prison at the hands of another prisoner, it is a state imposed death penalty, only that kind is a lot more unjust, arbitrary and cowardly.

Reply

Ed Baranowski

3:20 pm on Saturday, March 16, 2013

They got it right this time! The killing of any human being in "cold" blood should be dealt with supreme punishment. The life long pain and suffering families and friends endure is nothing to life in prison to the murderer who has no honest remorse. The gov. got it wrong again. You cannot possibly save taxpayer money on pro longing a murderer's life in prison when you add up the daily food, board, and detention law officers' salaries to watch them. Fear of the consequences in wrong doing helps to keep our society a little safer since law enforcement officers cannot be every where all the time, they relie on this "fear" factor. ex. We do 65 on the inter state because we don't know if we'll get caught trying our luck at 80 by that state trooper who may not be in the line of sight. The same applies to any mass murderer killing innocent children or taking sniper attacks on civilians. With the death penalty we have the fear factor in place that will make that person think twice before aiming his fire arm at another human being, outside of self defense.
I'm worried about the judicial system if this repeal goes through. Will a convicted murderer only get sentenced on a lesser charge and not life if he makes a plea bargain with his attorney? The system is not perfect and I hope and pray no innocent individual is wrongly sentenced to death without extensive investigation and reliable DNA testing but it's all we have in this society to keep it safe for ourselves and the children.

Reply

1ke

9:04 pm on Saturday, March 16, 2013

Did everybody notice that Del. Pat McDonough did not appear for the vote? He must have been looking for thugs in Downtown Baltimore that day or getting ready for a St. Patrick Day blowout.

Reply

lynn

10:40 pm on Saturday, March 16, 2013

The death penatly WOULD be a deterrent if it was used!!!! O'malley is an ass. I think ALL the senators, etc. should serve for only 2 years., including Congressman.
Don't understand HOW it is more expensive to execute a criminal than keep the lousy sob alive! They can get their education, health care, food, dentistry, etc. all FREE. Hmm, I have a $4500.00 deductible before ANYTHING is covered. This is completly screwed up!
For the bleeding hearts who say it's better to keep them alive, and that it's inhumane to kill them. Never have understood this. I say kill them just like they killed their victims. Eye for an eye? Our legal system is a total joke.

Reply

703

11:57 pm on Saturday, March 16, 2013

LIFE in prison is probably better than what the murdered had before he killed someone. Look at the Newtown school shooter, or the guy who took out a theater full of people. If they don't get the death penalty they have room, meals, recreation, TV, air conditioning and heat and don't forget they have every opportunity to escape. I believe they should be sent to God for trial... going down?

Reply

Maureen Rowland

1:15 am on Sunday, March 17, 2013

I am very disappointed that our Harford County delegation for not voting to repeal the death penalty. It is a barbaric practice not practiced in any other civilized country. You are so concerned about the government interfering with your lives and fail to understand the ultimate interference is being able to kill you. Prosecutors cannot be trusted to use their discretion wisely since they have abandoned their responsibility and are driven by media influence and their political agenda. The death penalty is not a deterrent; when a murder is committed the person is not worried about the death penalty because they do not expect to get caught. It is expensive because the trials are expensive with experts on both sides for both the trial and death penalty phases. They last longer than other trials and therefore cause other cases to be postponed, which costs money. The appeal process is long and expensive with lawyers on both sides and multiple court filings. This also uses a significant amount of judicial resources and causes delays in the judicial system. They are also more likely to win a new trial on appeal which means the government bears the cost of another lengthy trial. Remember Kirk Bloodsworth was proven innocent but was on death row and had 3 trials. If it weren't for judges mistakes and unethical conduct of prosecutors being discovered he would be dead. An innocent person killed by the government. That is one too many.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Progressive One

11:02 am on Sunday, March 17, 2013

Maureen,

Thank you for being the only voice of reason on this list. It sounds like most who disagree with you and me did not attend the hearings in Annapolis. If they had they would have heard families of victims speak against the death penalty. They would have heard the true cost of housing criminals versus prolonged appeals against a death sentence. They would have heard how this saved money could be used to help families of victims recover from their loss, rather than spend years reliving a tragedy. They would have seen the statistics which prove that the death penalty is not and never has been a deterrent to murder.

For those who prefer to live in a state which supports the death penalty, you have 32 choices. Please pick one and leave the informed public in the state of Maryland. If you wish to be informed, attend a hearing, read the public notes. You are entitled to your own opinion, but you are not entitled to your own facts.

Otto Schmidlap

1:03 pm on Sunday, March 17, 2013

I'm sure I can deduce from this that you are also against abortion...the taking of a sweet and innocent life simply for the sake of convenience. lol

Reply

Leave a comment