patching...
Gallery: Seen anything interesting around town? Post your photos in our Pics & Clips Gallery. »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Maryland Court Of Appeals

Tuesday, March 5, 2013

Court Strikes Down Portion of Sex Offender Registry Law

The Maryland Court of Appeals rules that people convicted of sex crimes prior to 2009 do not have to register with the state.

Some people convicted of sex crimes prior to the existence of the state's sex offender registry may no longer have to register with the state Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services, according to a ruling by the Maryland Court of Appeals. The split decision, issued Monday, struck a registry requirement, imposed upon the defendant by legislation passed later, on the basis that it violated a clause in the Maryland Declaration of Rights prohibiting retroactive laws.  [A copy of the ruling is attached to this story.] "Registration was imposed, over twenty years later in 2009, under the sex offender registration statute as a direct consequence of petitioner’s commission and conviction for his sex crime. The application of the …

Comment_arrow

Chuck Burton

10:24 am on Thursday, March 14, 2013

If I had the wherewithall, and were a bit younger, I probably would. The trouble is just about every nation today is fascist or socialist to some degree. There is no libertarian country to my knowlege.   more ›

Thursday, January 24, 2013

Legislation Would Ease Pressure on Pit Bull Owners and Landlords

Bills in the House of Delegates and Senate would create a new standard where all dog owners are presumed liable for dog attacks, regardless of the breed of the animal.

Legislation overriding a Maryland Court of Appeals ruling that made landlords liable for pit bull attacks, and put owners at risk of being evicted or having to give up their dogs, will be heard Wednesday by the House Judiciary Committee. Identical House and Senate bills seek to create a new standard where all dog owners in civil action cases, regardless of the dog’s breed, are presumed liable for attacks unless owners can prove they did everything possible to avoid the attack, said Sen. Brian Frosh, sponsor of the Senate bill. It would also reverse the strict liability on landlords. “The interest groups: pet owners, landlords, and animal rights groups are pleased with it,” said Frosh, a Montgomery County Democrat who is also chairman of …

Real Estate Bulls

1:37 am on Thursday, April 18, 2013

This post is very interesting for me and I admired the content which is about pit bulls. I think all the owners of dogs must have insurance. It would be a good decision for an animal lover. Real Estate Bulls   more ›

Friday, November 9, 2012

Court Upholds State Legislative Redistricting Maps

Baltimore County State Sens. Jim Brochin and Delores Kelley and two other lawsuits challenged that the maps were not legally drawn.

The state's highest court has upheld state legislative redistricting maps drawn earlier this year. The one-page ruling does state that the court "determined that the Governor’s plan is consistent with the requirements of the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of Maryland." Details behind the courts decision will be provided at a later date, according to the court ruling. Sens. Jim Brochin and Delores Kelley were involved in one of three suits against the redistricting plan on which the court heard arguments on Wednesday. The Democrats claim the new districts violate the Maryland Constitution and a 2002 Court of Appeals ruling that governs redistricting. The suit alleges that Gov. Martin O'Malley and the General Assembly…

xiaohui

11:05 am on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

1elected general http://www.coachfactoryoutletonlinebc.org secretary.Khatib, 50, was jailed several times for criticising Assad. He http://www.coachoutletod.com finally fled into exile this year."This is a serious step http://www.coachfactoryoutletbo.net against the regime and a serious step towards freedom," Syrian National Councilhttp://www.coachoutletpn.com leader George Sabra said of Khatib, …   more ›

Tuesday, August 21, 2012

Court Of Appeals Won't Reconsider Pit Bull Decision

Court removes references to pit bull mixes while leaving owners and landlords responsible for injuries caused by pure-bred dogs.

UPDATED (4:27 p.m.)—The Maryland Court of Appeals will not reconsider an April decision in which it ruled that pit bull dogs are"inherently dangerous." Judge Alan Wilner, in a nine-page decision issued Tuesday, denied the motion for reconsideration with one caveat. (The full decision is attached to this story.) "That said, having re-read the briefs, relevant portions of the record extract, and the dissent, I am now convinced that, on the record before us, the application of the Court’s holding of strict liability to cross-bred pit bulls was both gratuitous and erroneous," wrote Wilner. "I would grant the motion for reconsideration, in part, to delete any reference to cross-bred pit bulls, so that the Court’s holding would apply only to pit…

Comment_arrow

Frank

2:24 pm on Saturday, December 1, 2012

Previously from Missy: "This is a dog Holocaust, and Tony Solesky is Adolph Hitler." Somehow I doubt she would have written that if she had been talking to Tony Smith.   more ›

Monday, July 30, 2012

Supreme Court: Maryland DNA Ruling Conflicts With Other States

Four-page opinion hints that justices will likely overturn Maryland ruling involving the collection of samples from people charged with felonies.

UPDATED (6:00 p.m.)—U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts continued a stay in the Maryland Court of Appeals ruling that had stopped police departments in Maryland from collecting DNA samples from some arrestees. With the delay continued, police in Maryland can continue to collect the samples until the Supreme Court issues an opinion.  Roberts, in a four-page order, wrote that there is a reasonable chance that Maryland could win its appeal and overturn the Court of Appeals ruling. "[The Maryland Court of Appeals] decision conflicts with decisions of the U. S. Courts of Appeals for the Third and Ninth Circuits as well as the Virginia Supreme Court, which have upheld statutes similar to Maryland’s DNA Collection Act," Roberts wrote. …

asdfg

8:38 am on Monday, March 11, 2013

http://www.coachoutletonlineusa2013.com/ Coach Outlet USA Coach Outlet Online http://www.monstervbeats.net/ Beats By Dre Pro Moster Headphones Outlet http://www.guccishoesuk.net/ Gucci Shoes UK Gucci Outlet Online http://www.new-michaelkors.com/ Michael Kors Outlet Michael Kors Handbags http://www.mk-michaellkorsoutlet.net/ Michael Kors Outlet Online http://www.northfacejacketsoutletonline.net/ …   more ›

Tuesday, May 15, 2012

Marylanders Rally Against Pit Bull Court Opinion

Protestors argued that pit bulls are being unfairly targeted by the Maryland Court of Appeals.

Annapolis resident Stehle Harris is afraid she won't have a home.  As the owner of a bull terrier, Harris said the recent Maryland Court of Appeals opinion that pit bulls and pit bull crossbreeds are dangerous could lead to a slippery slope. The opinion also states that landlords can prohibit the dogs from their properties. "I think pit bulls capacity to do damage is no greater than a chihuahua," she said. "I'm more apprehensive about smaller dogs." Harris was one of a group of Marylanders protesting the court's opinion at Lawyer's Mall in Annapolis on Tuesday afternoon.  Erin Harty, of Baltimore, said Harris' fears aren't unfounded. As a volunteer at Baltimore Animal Rescue and Care Shelter, she said the center is already being …

Jeanne

7:05 pm on Friday, August 3, 2012

This is a fact: Pit Bulls can be nasty if encouraged but raised in a good home and treated well, have food and dry safe place to live, Pit Bulls are a wonderful dog. ALL dogs can attack if given incouragement. I have a Lab and if someone comes after me he knows to protect me. When we go out and there is a stranger that is acting funny my Lab will only walk between me and the stranger, my neighbor…   more ›

Monday, April 30, 2012

Are Pit Bulls Dangerous by Nature? Court Says Yes

The Maryland Court of Appeals has ruled that owners of pit bulls are liable for damages caused by attacks by the breed.

If your pit bull attacks someone, don't expect much sympathy in court. An opinion recently released by the Maryland Court of Appeals states that you should have already known the breed was dangerous. Maryland pit bull owners are now facing increased liability in attack cases, following a ruling in Tracey v. Solesky. The case involved a pit bull named Clifford that attacked a minor, causing life-threatening injuries.  "When an attack involves pit bulls, it is no longer necessary to prove that the particular pit bull or pit bulls are dangerous," wrote Judge Dale R. Cathell in the opinion. Cathell also stated that landlords have the right to prohibit pit bulls or pit bull cross-breeds from their property. A PDF of the opinion is attached in …

Comment_arrow

Urge Tech

1:15 am on Thursday, January 3, 2013

Highly descriptive post, I enjoyed that bit. Will there be a part 2? http://www.catguide.eu   more ›

Got a Hot Tip?
 
 

Videos